U.S. stock-market investors hopefully enjoyed the sizable gains booked over the past several years, because it might be a while before they’re seen again.
That’s according to Morgan Stanley, the investment bank that has been notably cautious on Wall Street in 2018.
“We believe 2018 marks the beginning of a wide trading range that could last several years,” wrote Michael Wilson, the firm’s chief U.S. equity strategist.
He said the boundaries for the S&P 500 SPX, +0.00% would be between 2,400 and 3,000, a range of 25% that the benchmark index currently sits near the middle of. It closed Tuesday at 2,887.89; based on that, the low end of Morgan Stanley’s range would represent a drop of 16.9% from its current level, while the high end would make for a gain of 3.9%. The firm’s “base case” price target for the S&P is 2,750, or down 4.8% from current levels.
“While the price damage may not be extreme at the index level, it may feel and look a lot like a bear market,” he said. “We think this ‘rolling bear market’ has already begun with peak valuations in December and peak sentiment in January.”
Don’t miss: After 10 fat years for stock investors a lean decade is looming
Wilson has been warning on U.S. stocks for months. In May, Morgan Stanley calculated that expectations for future returns were at an 11-year low, meaning they’re at their weakest level since before the financial crisis.
In July, he predicted that the market would see its largest correction in months, with the rally showing signs of “exhaustion.” In early August, he said the bull market — by some measures, the longest in history — was in its “last innings” as bears would turn their focus to the technology and consumer-discretionary sectors, two parts of the market that have been lifting the overall indexes.
“Our call is not for a simultaneous and large repricing across risk assets, but for a bear market that rolls through different assets and sectors at different times with the weakest links,” he wrote. Bitcoin, emerging market debt and equities, Italian government bonds, funding spreads, base metals, and early-cycle industries like home builders and airlines are being hit first or hardest, Wilson said.
The S&P 500 is up 8% in the year to date, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.17% has risen 5.1% and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, -0.33% is up 15.5%.
The positive move of the broader indexes, however, mask how concentrated the gains have been. While eight of the 11 primary S&P 500 industry groups are in positive territory for the year, only three (tech, consumer discretionary, and health-care) have done better than the index. Those gains have contributed the bulk of the overall market’s rise, and helped to insulate it from such issues as rising trade tensions and steep losses in emerging markets.
Don’t miss: Why a bearish Wall Street ‘weatherman’ still sees clouds ahead for stocks
The primary factor that could bring the multiyear bull rally to an end, Wilson wrote, was the removal of accommodative policies from central banks around the world.
“Less central bank liquidity support as we near the end of an economic cycle should bring higher volatility as risk assets and markets lose some of their ability to absorb shocks,” he wrote.
Related: Stock volatility and changing Fed policy have killed the ‘buy the dip’ mentality
Morgan Stanley is not the only firm seeing risk from Fed policy. Last week, Barry Bannister, head of institutional equity strategy at Stifel, said it “seems assured” that a bear market would occur in the next six to 12 months, a selloff he expects will be driven by the U.S. central bank raising interest rates.
Read more: Stocks are in ‘the danger zone,’ and it is ‘assured’ that a bear market will occur in the next year, analyst warns
In addition, J.P. Morgan recently wrote that the removal of accommodative central-bank policies — installed in reaction to the financial crisis — could wind up being a major cause of the next crisis.
J.P. Morgan referred to its hypothetical scenario as the “great liquidity crisis,” and said that the timing of when it could occur “will largely be determined by the pace of central bank normalization, business cycle dynamics, and various idiosyncratic events such as escalation of trade war waged by the current U.S. administration,” the report read.