Shares of Coty (NYSE: COTY) fell as much as 17.7% on Tuesday after the beauty product company reported its results for its fiscal fourth quarter of 2017. But the stock recovered some of its loss and finished the trading day down 9.4%.
For its fourth quarter, Coty reported revenue of $2.24 billion and a loss per share of $0.41. On an adjusted basis, earnings per share was about breakeven. Investor pessimism on Tuesday likely reflected the company’s lower-than-expected adjusted loss per share. While Coty’s $2.24 billion in revenue exceeded a consensus estimate for revenue of $2.16 billion, its adjusted EPS of about $0.00 was well below a consensus estimate for $0.09.
Image source: Getty Images.
Coty’s worse-than-expected loss per share reflected rising marketing spend and higher-than-expected costs associated with its acquisition of a range of Procter & Gamble beauty products last year. A “higher combined company fixed cost base” weighed on profitability, management explained.
Management admitted that its cost base is “not where it should be.” But it said in its fourth-quarter press release that it is rapidly addressing its high fixed cost base as part of its “synergy program and organic efficiency initiatives.”
Going forward, Coty says it is prioritizing addressing its high fixed cost base in fiscal 2018.
10 stocks we like better than Procter & Gamble
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor , has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Procter & Gamble wasn’t one of them! That’s right — they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 1, 2017
Daniel Sparks has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.